Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holyoak, S.
Right arrow Articles by Piper, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Talking to second language wrjters: using interview data to investigate contrastive rhetoric

Stephen Holyoak

University of Southampton

Alison Piper

University of Southampton

The tradition of studying contrastive rhetoric through the analysis of texts is now broadening out to address more dynamic and complex issues of context and personal experience. Focusing on expository text, this paper examines the potential of using data from interviews with second-language writers to explore the ways in which writing differs between languages and cultures. It reports on a study of 17 university staff and postgraduate students, all seasoned academic writers in both their mother tongue and English, who were interviewed about their understanding of rhetorical differences between the two languages and the implications of these differences for their own experience as writers. It concludes that, while interview-based data on cross-cultural rhetoric have limitations in terms of generalizability, productivity, and verification, the process and its outcomes can contribute both to research and to the teaching of writing.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 122-148 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/136216889700100203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?