This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Alderson, J. C. Articles by Steel, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency

Lancaster University

Caroline Clapham

Lancaster University

David Steel

Lancaster University

This paper reports on an ESRC-funded study of the levels of knowledge about language of first-year undergraduate student learners of French and the relationship between this metalinguistic knowledge and language proficiency and aptitude. Tests of metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and French linguistic proficiency were administered to 509 students. The results show that levels of metalinguistic knowledge vary considerably. However, the relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and language proficiency is weak. Meta-linguistic knowledge and language proficiency appear to constitute two separate factors of linguistic ability. Moreover, there was no support for the belief that students with higher levels of metalinguistic knowledge perform better at French, or that they improve their French proficiency at higher rates than other students during university study. Whilst knowledge about language may be worthwhile in its own right, there is no evidence from this study to justify the teaching of metalinguistic knowledge as a means of improving students' linguistic proficiency.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 93-121 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/136216889700100202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Roehr Metalinguistic Knowledge and Language Ability in University-Level L2 Learners Applied Linguistics, June 1, 2008; 29(2): 173 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ellis Modelling Learning Difficulty and Second Language Proficiency: The Differential Contributions of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 431 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Eckes and R. Grotjahn A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests Language Testing, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 290 - 325. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Macaro and L. Masterman Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference? Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2006; 10(3): 297 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Yamashita Processes of taking a gap-filling test: comparison of skilled and less skilled EFL readers Language Testing, July 1, 2003; 20(3): 267 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Johnson Editorial Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2000; 4(1): 1 - 2. [PDF]

				N. Schmitt The relationship between TOEFL vocabulary items and meaning, association, collocation and word-class knowledge Language Testing, April 1, 1999; 16(2): 189 - 216. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Allison Investigating learners' course diaries as explorations of language Language Teaching Research, January 1, 1998; 2(1): 24 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]