This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Skehan, P. Articles by Foster, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance

Thames Valley University

Pauline Foster

Thames Valley University

This paper examines the effects of planning and post-task activity on task-based performance. It is motivated by the need, given recent claims that task-based instruction has desirable pedagogic qualities, to investigate the effects of choosing different types of tasks, as well as different task implementation conditions, on the fluency, accuracy and complexity of the language which is produced when tasks are carried out. Three tasks are investigated: a personal task, a narrative task and a decision task. A 2-by-2 research design was used, with two planning conditions (10 minutes' planning time vs no planning time) and two post-task conditions (plus or minus knowledge of a post-task). Performance was assessed through the number of pauses (as a measure of fluency), the percentage of error-free clauses (to measure accuracy) and the level of subordination (as a measure of complexity). Confirming hypotheses and previous research, planning had clear effects on almost all measures. The hypothesis that foreknowledge of a post-task activity would selectively influence accuracy received only partial confirmation. Data from the present study was also related to results reported in an earlier study. This revealed that there is strong evidence of trade-off effects between the different dependent variables used, in that fluency, accuracy and complexity seem to enter into competition with one another, given the limited attentional capacities of second language users. Finally, there are indications that task characteristics interact with planning time and lead to selective improvements in particular areas. Tasks which contain clearer inherent structure, when planned, seem to favour accuracy, whereas tasks which require more on-line processing or which have complex outcomes, when planned, produce greater complexity.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, 185-211 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/136216889700100302


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tomiyama Age and Proficiency in L2 Attrition: Data from Two Siblings Applied Linguistics, June 1, 2009; 30(2): 253 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Taguchi Chunk learning and the development of spoken discourse in a Japanese as a foreign language classroom Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2007; 11(4): 433 - 457. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Lumley and B. O'Sullivan The effect of test-taker gender, audience and topic on task performance in tape-mediated assessment of speaking Language Testing, October 1, 2005; 22(4): 415 - 437. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Fulcher and R. M. Reiter Task difficulty in speaking tests Language Testing, July 1, 2003; 20(3): 321 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Elder, N. Iwashita, and T. McNamara Estimating the difficulty of oral proficiency tasks: what does the test-taker have to offer? Language Testing, October 1, 2002; 19(4): 347 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Nemeth and J. Kormos Pragmatic aspects of task-performance: the case of argumentation Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2001; 5(3): 213 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bygate Introduction Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2000; 4(3): 185 - 192. [PDF]

				T. Lynch and J. Maclean Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2000; 4(3): 221 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. Dornyei and J. Kormos The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2000; 4(3): 275 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bygate Quality of language and purpose of task: patterns of learners' language on two oral communication tasks Language Teaching Research, July 1, 1999; 3(3): 185 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Foster and P. Skehan The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance Language Teaching Research, July 1, 1999; 3(3): 215 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]