Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LoCastro, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Politeness and pragmatic competence in foreign language education

Virginia LoCastro

International Christian University

Anecdotal evidence indicates that some native speakers of English are uncomfortable with what they perceive to be the lack of linguistic politeness forms in the speech of some Japanese speakers of English. A common example is found in the expression of desires and wants, when a Japanese speaker will say 'I want you to do X', rather than 'I'd like you to do X'. As it is possible the learning materials Japanese students used in secondary school EFL had an influence on their ability to use politeness markers in their L2, this paper will report on an analysis of evidence of politeness in senior high school textbooks. First, in order to go beyond the anecdotal evidence, there is a review of some of the relevant literature on linguistic politeness. The analysis follows in which it will be seen that there is a noticeable absence of politeness. Finally, five speculations on explanations for the absence of linguistic politeness markers are suggested in an effort to raise the awareness of language educators about this component of pragmatic competence.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, 239-267 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/136216889700100304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?