Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jing, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Learner resistance in metacognition training? An exploration of mismatches between learner and teacher agendas

Huang Jing

Zhanjiang Teachers University/University of Hong Kong, peterjh{at}hkusua.hku.hk

This paper examines how and why learner resistance (to the teacher’s goals and expectations) occurred in a metacognition-training (MT) project, which aimed to enhance reflection and autonomy in EFL learning. MT was integrated into a regular EFL reading course for second-year BA TEFL undergraduates at a Chinese university. Learner resistance in the MT project was manifested partly through mismatches between the goals and expectations on the part of the teacher and the students. After suggesting initial reasons for learner resistance, the paper explores more complex explanations. That is, at a more macro level, institutional pressures and societal expectations arising from an influential national test (TEM-4) gave rise to an examination culture; at a more micro level, these controlling pressures and expectations were realized by the pragmatic product-oriented approach in the EFL classroom and by students’ positioning as examination learners. These might help explain why learner resistance occurred in the MT project. The paper notes in the end that learner resistance is also a matter of tensions and conflicts in learner and teacher agendas, and in learners’ short-term and long-term priorities in learning. Based on this, implications for EFL teaching and learning are explored.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 95-117 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/136216880601000107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
A. Littlejohn
The Tip of the Iceberg: Factors Affecting Learner Motivation
RELC Journal, August 1, 2008; 39(2): 214 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
R. E. Silver
Trainee teachers' understanding of content/language connections
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2008; 12(1): 105 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
M. Bloom
Tensions in a non-traditional Spanish classroom
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2007; 11(1): 85 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]