Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Understanding practitioner research as a form of life: an Eastern interpretation of Exploratory Practice

Zongjie Wu

Zhejiang University, China, zongjiewu{at}zju.edu.cn

Allwright and colleagues around the world have been developing Exploratory Practice as an approach to practitioner research different from the familiar notion of teacher research. EP offers a set of principles devoted to understanding, in a collaborative mode, the quality of language classroom life. Several underlying points, such as ‘quality of life’, ‘incommunicable understandings’, ‘puzzlement’, and so forth often go beyond the common meanings of the terms. The paper ventures to make a philosophical inquiry into such underlying ideas, combined with ethnographic investigation of an actual case based on a teacher-initiated research project. The inquiry is made in the light of both Western and Eastern philosophical thought, and its outcomes are analysed and presented in the form of stories. I propose that Exploratory Practice is best seen as a venture of experiencing authentic being through critical practices for understanding the quality of classroom life in terms of ‘what is inherently so’ (yin qi gu ran) and by searching for a language of Tao (the nameless). Following the route of ‘being’, ‘understanding’ and ‘naming’, this venture aims at the harmonization of teachers’ professional lives, where teaching is revealing being through words, and ‘then conversely, learning is experiencing what a teacher’s words reveal’ (Thomson, 2001: 259).

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 331-350 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/1362168806lr200oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?