Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake

Younghee Sheen

University of Nottingham, UK, aexyhs{at}nottingham.ac.uk

This study presents a taxonomy of the recasts that arose in communicative ESL and EFL classrooms. The taxonomy is used to examine the relationship between different characteristics of recasts and learner uptake/repair. Characteristics that were significantly related to uptake were the length of recasts (short vs. long), the linguistic focus (pronunciation vs. grammar), the type of change (substitution vs. addition). Also, these features - along with mode (declarative vs. interrogative), the use of reduction (partial recasts) and the number of changes (one vs. multiple) - were associated with learner repair. These results are discussed in terms of a general distinction between implicit and explicit recasts and the extent to which recasts are salient to learners linguistically and pragmatically. The study suggests that explicit recasts lead to more uptake/repair because they are focused on a single linguistic feature and the reformulated item is salient to learners.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, 361-392 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/1362168806lr203oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?