Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tode, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Durability problems with explicit instruction in an EFL context: the learning of the English copula be before and after the introduction of the auxiliary be

Tomoko Tode

Osaka Municipal Taisho-Higashi Junior High School, Japan, tode{at}nuhw.ac.jp

The purpose of this study is to investigate the durability of the effect of explicit and implicit instructions on beginning EFL learners’ learning of the copula be. The study intends to examine whether or not the effect remains after the auxiliary be of the progressive is introduced. Three groups of 89 Japanese junior high school students participated in the quasi-experiment. One group was given explicit instruction on the rule of the copula be. Another group was given implicit instruction under which the participants memorized exemplars without focusing on the rule. The third group was not given any treatment on the target structure. After progress was measured with a pretest and two post-tests, the three groups were provided with the same form-focused instructions on the progressive. Then, three further post-tests were given to see if the instruction on the auxiliary be had any impact on the mastery of the copula be. Major findings were (1) explicit instruction had positive effects in the short term, while implicit instruction did not; (2) the effects of the former did not last, especially after presentation of the progressive. The findings indicate that instruction after explicit instruction must include some adjustments to retain its effect.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, 11-30 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1362168806072398


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?