Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dörnyei, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kormos, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance

Zoltán Dörnyei

University of Nottingham, zoltan.dornyei{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Judit Kormos

Eötvös University, Budapest

This paper reports on a data-based study in which we explored - as part of a larger-scale British-Hungarian research project - the effects of a number of affective and social variables on foreign language (L2) learners’ engagement in oral argumentative tasks. The assumption underlying the investigation was that students’ verbal behaviour in oral task situations is partly determined by a number of non-linguistic and non-cognitive factors whose examination may constitute a potentially fruitful extension of existing task-based research paradigms. The independent variables in the study included various aspects of L2 motivation and several factors characterizing the learner groups the participating students were members of (such as group cohesiveness and intermember relations), as well as the learners’ L2 proficiency and ‘willingness to communicate’ in their L1. The dependent variables involved objective measures of the students’ language output in two oral argumentative tasks (one in the learners’ L1, the other in their L2): the quantity of speech and the number of turns produced by the speakers. The results provide insights into the interrelationship of the multiple variables determining the learners’ task engagement, and suggest a multi-level construct whereby some independent variables only come into force when certain conditions have been met.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 275-300 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/136216880000400305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
Y. Kim and K. McDonough
The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2008; 12(2): 211 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of BilingualismHome page
J.-M. Dewaele
The effect of multilingualism, sociobiographical, and situational factors on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety of mature language learners
International Journal of Bilingualism, December 1, 2007; 11(4): 391 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of BilingualismHome page
J.-M. Dewaele
Psychological and sociodemographic correlates of communicative anxiety in L2 and L3 production
International Journal of Bilingualism, March 1, 2002; 6(1): 23 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
N. Nemeth and J. Kormos
Pragmatic aspects of task-performance: the case of argumentation
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2001; 5(3): 213 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]