Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Storch, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs

Neomy Storch

Centre for Communication Skills and ESL, University of Melbourne, n.storch{at}language.unimelb.edu.au

A common teaching strategy in the language classroom is to assign students to work on a task in pairs or small groups. Research on group/pair has shown that such classroom organization promotes speaking practice and negotiations of meaning. However, most of the studies on pair work to date have focused on factors affecting the quantity of certain types of negotiation moves. Very few studies have investigated the nature of group or pair interactions; that is, whether they are collaborative or not. Moreover, very few studies have utilized tasks which require students to produce a written text in pairs.

The study reported in this paper investigated the performance of three pairs of adult ESL students on a writing task assigned in class. The main source of data was transcripts of the pair talk. Other sources of data included the researcher’s observation notes and the written text the pairs produced. Data were analysed for salient features of student interactions and characteristics of collaborative pair work were identified. Results show that students working in pairs may not necessarily work in a collaborative manner, but where they do collaborate this may have an effect on task performance.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 29-53 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/136216880100500103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
Y. Kim and K. McDonough
The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2008; 12(2): 211 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
Y. Watanabe and M. Swain
Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2007; 11(2): 121 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
R. Adams
L2 output, reformulation and noticing: implications for IL development
Language Teaching Research, July 1, 2003; 7(3): 347 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]