This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Németh, N. Articles by Kormos, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pragmatic aspects of task-performance: the case of argumentation

Eötvös Loránd University, Department of English Applied Linguistics, Budapest

Judit Kormos

Eötvös Loránd University, Department of English Applied Linguistics, Budapest, dolgos.l{at}mail.datanet.hu

The study reported in this paper investigated the pragmatic aspects of task-performance in a series of argumentation tasks that 24 Hungarian learners of English performed over a period of two years. The aim of our research project was to determine how task-repetition, the long-term development of language skills, and a short-term focused intervention influenced various pragmatic measures of task-performance such as the pragmalinguistic markers of argumentation, the number of claims, counterclaims, supports and counter-supports. We also analysed how these variables differed when the participants performed the same type of task in their mother tongue. The results showed that in the repeated version of the task, familiarity with the task structure helped learners pay more attention to the informational content of their message, which was reflected in the higher number of supportive moves they produced. Participants were found to have better argumentation skills in their mother tongue and used a wider variety of pragmalinguistic markers than in L2. The language development assumed to have taken place during one year and the argumentation training, however, did not result in better pragmatic and pragmalinguistic performance.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 213-240 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/136216880100500303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Pinter Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2007; 11(2): 189 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]