Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Teaching Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom

Steve Walsh

The Queen’s University of Belfast, s.walsh{at}qub.ac.uk

To what extent do teachers of EFL hinder or facilitate learner contributions by their use of language? How can teachers enhance the quantity and quality of learner output by more careful language use? In what ways do teachers deny learning opportunities by ‘filling in the gaps’ or ‘smoothing over’ learner contributions? Adopting the position that maximizing learner involvement is conducive to second language acquisition, this paper examines the ways in which teachers, through their choice of language, construct or obstruct learner participation in face-to-face classroom communication. From the lesson extracts emerge a number of ways in which teachers can improve their teacher talk to facilitate and optimize learner contributions. The conclusion, that teachers’ ability to control their use of language is at least as important as their ability to select appropriate methodologies, has implications for both teacher education and classroom practices.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 3-23 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/1362168802lr095oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ELT JHome page
K. Wilson
Facilitator talk in EAP reading classes
ELT J, October 1, 2008; 62(4): 366 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
M. M. Chavez
The orientation of learner language use in peer work: teacher role, learner role and individual identity
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2007; 11(2): 161 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
L. Gourlay
OK, who's got number one? Permeable Triadic Dialogue, covert participation and the co-construction of checking episodes
Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2005; 9(4): 403 - 422.
[Abstract] [PDF]