This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mitchell, R. Articles by Lee, J. H.-W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Sameness and difference in classroom learning cultures: interpretations of communicative pedagogy in the UK and Korea

University of Southampton, rfm3{at}soton.ac.uk

Jenny Hye-Won Lee

University of Southampton, jhl{at}soton.ac.uk

This paper is a contribution to the growing sociolinguistic literature on classroom foreign/second language learning and teaching (Duff 1995; Willett, 1995; Bailey and Nunan, 1996; Bremer et al., 1996; Coleman, 1996; Toohey, 1998; Heller, 1999; Rampton, 1999). We report two case studies of mainstream beginner-level FL instruction, using observational and interview data gathered in schools in Seoul, Korea, and in Southern England. In both cases, the public rationales offered for foreign language learning include a mix of ‘internationalist’ and ‘instrumental’ values (MoE, 1995; DES, 1991; DfEE/QCA, 1999). The dominant language-teaching ideologies to which the teachers in the different locations declare allegiance are also similar, involving commitment to various principles of the ‘communicative approach’ to language teaching. (In both settings, for example, the speaking skill is given priority, there is use of group work, etc.) Through analysis of selected lesson excerpts we identify similarities and differences in the classroom interpretations of communicative methodology, and in particular the opportunities available for individual students to engage in L2 interaction. We examine how the identity of the ‘good language learner’ is constructed in the different settings, for example, through differing teacher emphases on individual vs. collective responsibility for learning. Differences between the two classrooms are linked to broader features of the educational setting, but we show that these differences do not reflect common stereotypes about Anglo and Asian teaching styles in any simple way.

Language Teaching Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, 35-63 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/1362168803lr114oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Hayes Becoming a teacher of English in Thailand Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2008; 12(4): 471 - 494. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Pinter Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2007; 11(2): 189 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. G. Butler Comparative perspectives towards communicative activities among elementary school teachers in South Korea, Japan and Taiwan Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2005; 9(4): 423 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Tomlinson and B. Dat The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to ELT methodology Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2004; 8(2): 199 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]